In Alabama, the loss for six months is estimated at $ 165 in one case and $ 250 in another. The plaintiffs claim that there are illegal similar games in their staff, and that the company can easily block access for states where games are prohibited, but did not do this. Both require the return of all losses and reasonable compensation for the appeal.
Similar accusations in the summer of this year led to significant losses for Big Fish Games. This is a company supplier of social casino games. The court initially refused the plaintiffs in compensation, but they filed an appeal and eventually won the case, and the company had to pay $ 155 million.
Apple and Google can save the fact that they are not suppliers, but simply place applications on their platforms. While Big Fish Games is the game developer and it is he who pays for the purchase of loans. And platforms receive a purchase commission.